Australian pastor Karina Kreminski recounts an awkward TV debate in which the well known British journalist and practising Christian Peter Hitchens reacted defensively in the presence of three other guests and an audience that largely did not appreciate Christian convictions.
Acknowledging the difficulty of the situation and appreciating too that Christians feel increasingly marginalised in western society, she wonders how we should react in order to offer a good witness to Christ.
To that end she cites the work of the Croatian theologian Miroslav Volf, who speaks of Christians presenting a ‘soft difference’, based on 1 Peter, an epistle where the Christians are described as ‘aliens’ who need to be witnesses to Christ, but ‘with gentleness and respect’ (1 Peter 3:15). We should not play down our differences – they are real. But we need to do so in a ‘soft’ way, reflecting the gentleness of Christ, rather than haranguing those with whom we disagree. (Volf’s article can be found here, but be aware that it isn’t written at a ‘popular’ level.)
What is your experience of this dilemma? Do you minimise the differences in order to avoid conflict? Do you become aggressive? Or do you manage to express this ‘soft difference’? If so, what do you find helpful in enabling you to do so?